Reading

Reading

Publications from the field of Civic AI, Participatory AI, and governing infrastructural AI. Essays and Field notes explore ideas and practices out in the open, alongside presentations.

Want to share a story here? Request to be a contributor

RSS New readings, essays and field notes in your feed reader

Tracking the field Listening to an emergent field: live searches of the research literature for participatory AI, civic AI and AI sovereignty.

Readings on civic AI and surrounds

Publications shared from across the field.

Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 2025

What is civic participation in artificial intelligence?

Renée Sieber, Ana Brandusescu, Suthee Sangiambut & Abigail Adu-Daako

A core reference for the Civic AI methodology. Sieber and colleagues ask what civic participation in AI actually means, and note that AI's opacity, mutability and resource requirements impede meaningful engagement, particularly in cities. They distinguish institutional transparency, functional empowerment and democratic empowerment.

  • participation
  • civic AI
  • cities

journals.sagepub.com DOI 10.1177/23998083241296200

University of Liverpool 2026

Magnificent Humanity: Civic AI in Dr Duncan's City

Iain Buchan

Liverpool built the world's first civic data cooperative on the back of its public health history. In this piece, Buchan argues for a civic path to AI that serves lives, livelihoods and life chances. Buchan's connected city architecture models civic AI governance and stewardship at the level of the city precinct and is an inspiration for civic interplay.

  • civic AI
  • cities
  • data stewardship

news.liverpool.ac.uk

University of Liverpool 2025

Liverpool City Region AI Charter

Liverpool City Region

A first-of-its-kind charter for responsible data sharing across a city region, which is what it looks like when civic AI stops being a framing and becomes a document people sign.

  • data stewardship
  • governance
  • cities

news.liverpool.ac.uk

Digital Statecraft Academy 2025

The Digital Statecraft Manifesto v1.0: The art, science, and practice of governance in the algorithmic age

Zeynep Engin, David Hand, Stefaan Verhulst, Emily Gardner, Jon Crowcroft, Philip Treleaven & Tim Gordon

Wonderful work by the Digital Statecraft Academy. “This is not just digital transformation. It is a fundamental reimagining of governance itself—how it works, who it serves, and how it sustains public trust in a world increasingly shaped by algorithms.”

  • governance
  • sovereignty

digitalstatecraft.academy

Ada Lovelace Institute 2023

Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labs

Ada Lovelace Institute

The Ada Lovelace Institute asked commercial AI labs what public participation they actually do. The answer: belief in it, no consistent methods, and obstacles that are structural rather than technical, being resourcing, siloes, misaligned incentives and commercial sensitivity. Useful for anyone who assumes participation fails for lack of good intentions.

  • participation
  • governance

adalovelaceinstitute.org

Ada Lovelace Institute ongoing

Public voices in AI

Octavia Field Reid and the Ada Lovelace Institute

The ongoing programme rather than the single report. It works on what the public actually thinks about AI and on the methods for getting those voices into decisions. Crucial because participation is the part everyone endorses and nobody specifies.

  • participation

adalovelaceinstitute.org

The GovLab 2026

Anticipatory Data Governance in the Age of AI

Stefaan Verhulst and colleagues

Seven signals from GovLab forecasting studios. The open data paradigm is under strain, ecosystems are becoming machine-centric, and data infrastructure is getting harder to sustain. Anticipatory AI governance is core to the civic interplay imaginary.

  • governance

arxiv.org DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2607.27029

UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose 2025

EuroStack: A European Alternative for Digital Sovereignty

Francesca Bria, Paul Timmers & Fausto Gernone

Bria is advancing the EuroStack initiative, building on data sovereignty efforts to reclaim European digital sovereignty, now in an era of AI.

  • sovereignty
  • infrastructure

ucl.ac.uk

Bertelsmann Stiftung ongoing

ReframeTech: algorithms for the common good

Bertelsmann Stiftung

The programme that commissioned EuroStack, establishing algorithms for the common good. Seeking partnerships for global AI governance.

  • public interest

bertelsmann-stiftung.de

European Commission 2024 to 2029

ENABLED: Innovation for data ecosystems and sovereignty

Joint Research Centre, Digital and Data Sovereignty Unit

The European Commission's own science service doing digital sovereignty as a research programme. Run out of the JRC's Digital and Data Sovereignty Unit in Ispra, it feeds the European Data Union Strategy and is standing up a Data Sharing and Digital Sovereignty Innovation Lab that uses regulatory sandboxing to test governance before it is legislated. Where EuroStack makes the argument from outside, this is the institution building the evidence from within.

  • sovereignty
  • data stewardship

joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu

Allen Lane 2022

Ways of Being: Beyond Human Intelligence

James Bridle

Bridle cautions against treating human intelligence as the only kind worth designing AI systems for. Bridle argues that "human-centred design" is a legacy model in a more-than-human world facing ecological collapse.

  • more-than-human

jamesbridle.com

Allen Lane 2019

Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence

James Lovelock

Near the end of his life Lovelock imagined AI as essential to Earth's self-regulation, with humans as enablers of a more intelligent life form. Lovelock's vision avoids the political economy of hyperscale AI, but it does bring a hopeful imagination to human-AI collaboration as a kind of hospicing of modernity, to another form of intelligence that may well outlive humanity. It helps set the frame: What kind of civic practices are agents trained in?

  • more-than-human
  • planetary

en.wikipedia.org

Ada Lovelace Institute 2021

Participatory data stewardship

Reema Patel, Aidan Peppin, Valentina Pavel, Jenny Brennan, Imogen Parker & Cansu Safak

The Ada Lovelace Institute introduced a framework for participatory data stewardship. This framework from 2021 states that it "rejects practices of data collection, storage, sharing and use in ways that are opaque or seek to manipulate people, in favour of practices that empower people to help inform, shape and – in some instances – govern their own data." The work is an early attempt to combine data stewardship with participatory AI practices by the Institute.

  • participation
  • data stewardship

adalovelaceinstitute.org

Essays

Exploratory thinking and experience in longer form, narrative prose.

We Care: Defining a politics for learning habitats. RMIT City North Social Innovation Precinct, 2025. Creative direction by Studio ESEM.
Essay · November 2025

Training grounds for micro-political imaginaries

If planetary institutions govern the digital world, what is the politics of planetary democracy? On imagination as practice, micro-political acts, and seeking spaces of civil repair.

Essay · November 2025

What's the ecological footprint of your digital life?

What's the material intensity of your digital footprint? This experimental calculator creates a material footprint of a gen-AI conversation.

Essay · August 2025

Learning to be Planetary Citizens: An Introduction

Somehow, in the not too distant past, who we are as citizens changed. Our allegiances shifted, our field of vision changed. Our everyday sensory realities morphed. Somehow, we became citizens of a…

Essay · August 2025

Can we shift our mindset?

Many of us spend huge amounts of time online and connected, but are worried about the negative impacts of digital technology - on the planet, on our mental health, on our politics, maybe in our communities.These are important things to worry about. But we also need to try to make better.

Essay · August 2025

The Active Interface

Learning (again) from Ursula LeGuin The late science fiction writer Ursula LeGuin, in her infinite wisdom, shared a definition of technology that resonates here deeply. Technology, she said, is the…

Essay · August 2025

The macro age

Civic Interplay is a space for reflection on a basic question: What does it mean to *become-citizen* in an era of (so-called) sovereign AI? Because the times have become strange - *agentic, even* - the nature of enquiry need not be without philosophy, or play…

Essay · October 2024

My dear Albert Einstein, what's happening to you?

Einstein's afterlives continue to morph and change. How do we protect what we love most about this creative misfit?

Essay · October 2024

Mystical language loops: A moment with Walter Benjamin

A refreshed newsletter focus for 2025, and an actual-imaginary encounter with Walter Benjamin to guide a mystical love of language & storytelling.

Essay · January 2021

You, me, data and the city

Is the data-rich city taking on a life of its own? And can Hugh Stretton’s Ideas for Australian Cities help us navigate its hazards? Originally published in 2019.

Back to top

Presentations

Recent appearances at conferences and events.

Data for Policy 2026, Digital Statecraft track, Barcelona 2026

Civic Interplay: Towards New AI Governance Imaginaries

Sarah Barns

Whose sovereignty, settled where? How civic interplay works as a practice of knowing, saying and asking, with the data centre build-out as its case. Slides, paper version.

American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, San Francisco 2026

From Platform Urbanism to Civic AI

Sarah Barns

Slides from the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, April 2026.

Back to top

Field notes

Thoughts or reflections in motion. Note: may contain poetry, or AI slop, or test ideas.

Field note diagram titled The local benefit ladder. Eight rungs running from reserved capacity at the bottom to standing at the top, arranged as a climb from compensation to co-ownership.
Field note · August 2026

The local benefit ladder

Eight things a community could ask for when a data centre arrives, from reserved capacity up to co-ownership. Each rung names a mechanism that already exists somewhere.

Field note diagram titled Who holds each layer of the Australian AI stack. Six layers, from minerals at the bottom to value and returns at the top, each labelled with who holds it: Washington and Beijing, Australia, global funds, hyperscalers, US labs, offshore. Land, water and energy is highlighted as the only layer Australia holds.
Field note · August 2026

An infrastructural-AI stack

Six layers of the Australian AI stack, and who holds each one. Australia holds the ground of a stack it does not hold.

Daniela Amodei, May 2026.
Field note · June 2026

Anthropic Civitas

Fighting the US Government through AI civics: Allowing space for Dario Amodei to define AI civics

Jack Clark in conversation at the Cosmos Institute, May 2026.
Field note · June 2026

Cosmic Jack Clark

Paying attention to what is being said, as the models are being trained, and the governance apparatus is laid out.

Christopher Oleh at the Vatican for the launch of Pope Leo's Encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, May 2026.
Field note · May 2026

What time are we living in?

The agentic era may be getting very weird. Oh wait it already was. Reflections during the week of Pope Leo's Encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas.

Field note · September 2025

They gathered inside a makeshift structure at De Ceuvel.

Irina was there to hug people on arrival. Many had not yet met. Some had cycled here from nearby, others had left their bicycles at home,  flown by aircraft, walked, caught the train across Europe.

Bar chart of research mentions: AI governance dwarfs civic AI and data centres plus community benefit.
Field note

Listening to an emergent field

Live searches for the vocabulary of civic AI across the research literature: a dated snapshot of how the field is talking.

Back to top